Sunday, September 19, 2010
Wednesday, September 08, 2010
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
Notes now through Apr 12
We made it through most of the "Higher direct images" section, which is remarkably painless.
Monday, April 05, 2010
Notes now through Apr 5
Including tiny fix to the long, tricky proof today: at one point I claimed we were computing the cohomology of one complex, but thankfully it was of a different, easier complex.
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Monday, February 08, 2010
Feb 3,5,8
Obviously I'm not keeping up the blog too well; the notes are more reliably up-to-date.
Anyway:
Derived functors. Injective resolutions. Acyclic objects for a functor.
Theorem: a resolution by acyclic objects is good enough for computing derived functors.
The category of sheaves has enough injectives. Flasque sheaves. Injective sheaves are flasque, flasque are acyclic.
Anyway:
Derived functors. Injective resolutions. Acyclic objects for a functor.
Theorem: a resolution by acyclic objects is good enough for computing derived functors.
The category of sheaves has enough injectives. Flasque sheaves. Injective sheaves are flasque, flasque are acyclic.
Tuesday, February 02, 2010
Feb 1
Finished horseshoe lemma.
Used classification of indecomposable reps of the A_n quiver to motivate the definition of homotopy operator.
Lemma: if phi_1, phi_2 : (P_i) -> (M_i) are chain maps inducing the same map on cohomology, and the (P_i) are projective, then there exists a homotopy operator.
Cor: if (P_i),(Q_i) are two projective resolutions, then they're homotopic. Hence when we apply a right exact functor to them, those complexes are still homotopic, so have the same cohomology.
Def. Injective modules.
Stated (but didn't prove) the analogue of the "TFAE" theorem we gave for projective modules.
Gave some examples injective Z-modules.
Used classification of indecomposable reps of the A_n quiver to motivate the definition of homotopy operator.
Lemma: if phi_1, phi_2 : (P_i) -> (M_i) are chain maps inducing the same map on cohomology, and the (P_i) are projective, then there exists a homotopy operator.
Cor: if (P_i),(Q_i) are two projective resolutions, then they're homotopic. Hence when we apply a right exact functor to them, those complexes are still homotopic, so have the same cohomology.
Def. Injective modules.
Stated (but didn't prove) the analogue of the "TFAE" theorem we gave for projective modules.
Gave some examples injective Z-modules.
Sunday, January 31, 2010
Jan 27 and 29
In the notes I'm marking things as 1/27/10, 1/29/10.
Basically, we studied projective modules, talked about long exact sequences on cohomology, defined Exts, and got started on the horseshoe lemma. Also we defined K^0(ring) using projective modules.
Basically, we studied projective modules, talked about long exact sequences on cohomology, defined Exts, and got started on the horseshoe lemma. Also we defined K^0(ring) using projective modules.
Monday, January 25, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)